Skip to main content

Backbone.js / Marionette.js Complex Defaults

I just worked through an interesting bug in a front-end single page application. The system has the ability to create new items, and one of the attributes of the item is an array of ids. When I created a new item after working with an existing one, ids from the older item were showing up in the new one. Similar issues were happening in several places in the codebase for that interface.

What I eventually realized is that the default attributes are passed into instantiated objects directly -- they are not deep copies. So my code was simply modifying the existing array rather than overwriting it, and as a result my old and new instances were both using the same attribute array of ids.

The takeaway lesson is that complex defaults, such as arrays or objects, should be set in the instantiation method so they are distinct in distinct instances.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ReactJS, NPM and Maven

I'm just starting to get into working with ReactJS, Facebook's open source rendering framework. My project uses SpringBoot for annotation-driven dependency injection and MVC. I thought it would be great if I could use a bit of ReactJS to enhance the application. If you're looking for a basic conceptual intro, I recommend ReactJS for Stupid People and of course the official documentation  is quite good. In full disclosure, I still have no idea how to do "flux" yet. As an experienced Java backend developer, I'm pretty decent at hacking Maven builds - which is precisely what this blog post is going to be about. First, a word about how React likes to be built. Like many front-end tools, there is a toolkit for the node package manager (NPM). From the command prompt, one might run npm install -g react-tools  which installs the jsx command. The  jsx  command provides the ability to transform JSX syntax into ordinary JavaScript, which is precisely what I want...

Solved: Unable to Locate Spring Namespace Handler

I attempted to run a Spring WebMVC application, and when starting up the application complained that it didn't know how to handle the MVC namespace in my XML configuration. The project runs JDK 7 and Spring 4.0.6 using Maven as the build system. The following is my XML configuration file: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"        xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"        xmlns:mvc="http://www.springframework.org/schema/mvc"        xsi:schemaLocation="         http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans         http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans.xsd         http://www.springframework.org/schema/mvc         http://www.springframework.org/schema/mvc/spring-mvc.xsd">          <mvc:annotation-driven/> ...

Capture Everything

This week I've started planning for the next version of our data collection system. The key realization for me is that I do not know all the questions we will need to answer in the future. Our current focus is on specific sequences of click events, but in the future we might want to look at browser versions or behavioral patterns related to IP addresses. If we don't capture user-agent, for example, we won't be able to answer questions about browser versions. If we don't capture IP then we cannot look for patterns in IP addresses. We should store data in a way that maximizes the range of questions we can address in the future. In the past few years, the cost of storing data have continued to fall. We use AWS extensively.  Amazon S3 costs are very reasonable and guarantees a high level of availability. Also, lower compute costs and open source tools like Hadoop that process large data volumes have greatly increased our ability to extract valuable insights from data. So s...