Skip to main content

Cryptic Facebook Message

Facebook OAuth2 is a feature I frequently integrate, but sometimes its error messages can be downright opaque. In particular I keep on forgetting to associate my Facebook account on applications where Sandbox Mode is enabled. The error message in this case is the following:
Sorry, this feature isn't available right now: An error occurred while processing this request. Please try again later.
This message is super cryptic, since what I usually need to do is to register my account as a tester or admin on the Facebook application page.

If you get this error message here are the steps to fix it:

  1. As an application administrator, go to the OAuth2 configuration page for the application in Facebook.
  2. Add the Facebook account as an admin or tester on the "edit roles" screen. This will send an application request to that account.
  3. As the added account, accept the application request to become an admin or tester.
At this point the Facebook login should work for the account while it is in Sandbox Mode. Of course it won't work for any accounts that haven't been added this way, but restricting access to core users is usually desirable while building an application.
Labels:
Location: Midtown, New York, NY, USA

Comments

  1. UnknownJuly 4, 2013 at 5:45 AM

    Another case for non sandbox/added tester,developer is case is when the user try to login with the facebook account which is not verified(i.e. email address in not verified)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

ReactJS, NPM and Maven

I'm just starting to get into working with ReactJS, Facebook's open source rendering framework. My project uses SpringBoot for annotation-driven dependency injection and MVC. I thought it would be great if I could use a bit of ReactJS to enhance the application. If you're looking for a basic conceptual intro, I recommend ReactJS for Stupid People and of course the official documentation  is quite good. In full disclosure, I still have no idea how to do "flux" yet. As an experienced Java backend developer, I'm pretty decent at hacking Maven builds - which is precisely what this blog post is going to be about. First, a word about how React likes to be built. Like many front-end tools, there is a toolkit for the node package manager (NPM). From the command prompt, one might run npm install -g react-tools  which installs the jsx command. The  jsx  command provides the ability to transform JSX syntax into ordinary JavaScript, which is precisely what I want...
20 comments
Read more

Solved: Unable to Locate Spring Namespace Handler

I attempted to run a Spring WebMVC application, and when starting up the application complained that it didn't know how to handle the MVC namespace in my XML configuration. The project runs JDK 7 and Spring 4.0.6 using Maven as the build system. The following is my XML configuration file: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"        xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"        xmlns:mvc="http://www.springframework.org/schema/mvc"        xsi:schemaLocation="         http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans         http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans.xsd         http://www.springframework.org/schema/mvc         http://www.springframework.org/schema/mvc/spring-mvc.xsd">          <mvc:annotation-driven/> ...
1 comment
Read more

AWS S3 versus CloudFront Performance

Yesterday I took Amazon CloudFront for a spin. Creating the CloudFront distribution was pretty simple - the wizard process flowed nicely. I found myself relying on the help text in places, but the most surprising thing was how long it took for the distribution to become enabled. I didn't time it exactly, but I probably spent 45 minutes waiting for my new CloudFront distribution to change from "In Progress" to "Enabled" status. The performance is a bit confusing. Compared to the S3 bucket, I didn't see any improvement in performance in a few tries - in fact, the CloudFront CDN performance was worse than the S3 bucket on its own for my 217 KB image file. I decided to take a larger sample, loading the same image 30 times in Chrome and noting the timing data from the "network" tab in the developer tools. I'm located in Brooklyn, have CloudFront configured for the US/Europe with download mode configured. My S3 bucket is in the US Standard zone, w...
Post a Comment
Read more