Skip to main content

AWS S3 versus CloudFront Performance

Yesterday I took Amazon CloudFront for a spin. Creating the CloudFront distribution was pretty simple - the wizard process flowed nicely. I found myself relying on the help text in places, but the most surprising thing was how long it took for the distribution to become enabled. I didn't time it exactly, but I probably spent 45 minutes waiting for my new CloudFront distribution to change from "In Progress" to "Enabled" status.
The performance is a bit confusing. Compared to the S3 bucket, I didn't see any improvement in performance in a few tries - in fact, the CloudFront CDN performance was worse than the S3 bucket on its own for my 217 KB image file. I decided to take a larger sample, loading the same image 30 times in Chrome and noting the timing data from the "network" tab in the developer tools. I'm located in Brooklyn, have CloudFront configured for the US/Europe with download mode configured. My S3 bucket is in the US Standard zone, which is probably on the east coast. Here is what I found:
CloudFront    S3      
Mean 343 ms 305 ms
Std Dev    230 ms 170 ms
The first observation is that there's a lot of variance in the performance of my ISP. The second is that the mean response times are pretty similar, and the relative frequencies in my samples are nearly identical (sorry no graphic - need to find a good tool for generating graphs for the blog). So I can't see any meaningful difference between S3 and CloudFront for my ISP in Brooklyn. However, I tested only with a single modest image, so there might be a more notable difference for other file sizes.
Some interesting statistics about performance from other regions of the country suggest the locality of the user is an important factor. I would expect that users who are more rural or are located further from the eastern United States would notice better performance over CloudFront than using S3 buckets in the US Standard configuration. For those of us located in close network proximity to our S3 buckets, the level of optimization in S3 seemingly matches that of the CDN.
I did this test to decide where I want to serve static images from for my demo site. For now I think I'm going to leave the CloudFront CDN enabled. My traffic volume is low enough that the cost isn't a big factor and the performance is probably better this way for some potential visitors.
Labels:
Location: Bay Ridge, Brooklyn, NY, USA

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

ReactJS, NPM and Maven

I'm just starting to get into working with ReactJS, Facebook's open source rendering framework. My project uses SpringBoot for annotation-driven dependency injection and MVC. I thought it would be great if I could use a bit of ReactJS to enhance the application. If you're looking for a basic conceptual intro, I recommend ReactJS for Stupid People and of course the official documentation  is quite good. In full disclosure, I still have no idea how to do "flux" yet. As an experienced Java backend developer, I'm pretty decent at hacking Maven builds - which is precisely what this blog post is going to be about. First, a word about how React likes to be built. Like many front-end tools, there is a toolkit for the node package manager (NPM). From the command prompt, one might run npm install -g react-tools  which installs the jsx command. The  jsx  command provides the ability to transform JSX syntax into ordinary JavaScript, which is precisely what I want. O
16 comments
Read more

Solved: Unable to Locate Spring Namespace Handler

I attempted to run a Spring WebMVC application, and when starting up the application complained that it didn't know how to handle the MVC namespace in my XML configuration. The project runs JDK 7 and Spring 4.0.6 using Maven as the build system. The following is my XML configuration file: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"        xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"        xmlns:mvc="http://www.springframework.org/schema/mvc"        xsi:schemaLocation="         http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans         http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans.xsd         http://www.springframework.org/schema/mvc         http://www.springframework.org/schema/mvc/spring-mvc.xsd">          <mvc:annotation-driven/>      </beans> I have a few more beans than this, but their details aren't especially relevant
1 comment
Read more

Spark Cassandra Connector Tip

We're using Databricks as our provider for Spark execution, and we've been struggling to get the Spark Cassandra connector to work outside of the local development environment. The connector was attempting to connect to 127.0.0.1 even though we were passing the new host information into the getOrCreate(..) call. After working with Ganesh at Databricks support, we figured it out. The realization is that in Databricks, calls to getOrCreate() from a fat jar don't create a new SparkContext object. Thus, the configuration passed in gets ignored. If you want to update the Cassandra host information for the connector, you must update it after  the call to getOrCreate() instead. Add the configuration directly to the context and you'll be good to go!
Post a Comment
Read more